Sunday, April 09, 2006
2 misconceptions abt criminal law
1) That criminal law, unlike civil law, is not concerned with compensation between offender and victim. Yet increasingly this distinction is blurred with compensation orders and other reparative ideas insinuating themselves as a regular adjunct of sentencing options.
2) That criminal law is often discussed solely in instrumental terms and is thought to be justified only on the grounds of what it achieves by way of public protection. But a moment’s thought reveals that this does not accord with the actual practice of criminal law and punishment. Not only are there many other means by which social control is achieved, but any attempt to draw a causal connection between criminal enforcement and reduced crime is fraught with problems.
Maybe, another view of criminal law is that it has an ideological function, that it makes statements about the boundaries of tolerated behaviour.
2) That criminal law is often discussed solely in instrumental terms and is thought to be justified only on the grounds of what it achieves by way of public protection. But a moment’s thought reveals that this does not accord with the actual practice of criminal law and punishment. Not only are there many other means by which social control is achieved, but any attempt to draw a causal connection between criminal enforcement and reduced crime is fraught with problems.
Maybe, another view of criminal law is that it has an ideological function, that it makes statements about the boundaries of tolerated behaviour.
Comments:
<< Home
now playing: hotel costes - cafe de flor
wahlau one of my papers (intl crim) is about the lack of compensation for vicitms in the ad hoc tribunals. write until want to die.. then come here see the same thing. hahaah.
hey babe... hahaha...
how many pages was tt paper? this proposition was made because of the development of the crime of corporate homicide/ corporate manslaughter by gross negligence...
i thought this was pretty interesting idealogy.
Post a Comment
how many pages was tt paper? this proposition was made because of the development of the crime of corporate homicide/ corporate manslaughter by gross negligence...
i thought this was pretty interesting idealogy.
<< Home
